The University of Leeds is a member of the prestigious Russell Group, and was rated by The Times as Britains 27th best university in the United Kingdom.
Its major successes include winning the ‘Higher Education Students’ Union of the Year’ in 2009. However all is not good within the Universities various management teams.
Back in December of 2009, tens of thousands of undergraduate students prepared themselves physically and mentally for the torment of examination season. The university runs a very efficient, and useful education platform powered by the renowned Blackboard virtual learning environment. This provides lecture notes, and revision materials to all students with a login, from any computer with internet access.
After Christmas, this service went down – it was unaccessible. For over a week, just days before the start of examinations, university students simply could not access revision material. Students -as the generalized stereotype goes- are extremely lazy. It is fair to say that we do not need extra motivation not to work. As such what proceeded to happen was somewhat amusing, and quite incredible.
One first year student proceeded to make a Facebook group with the novel name ‘If this group gets 1,000 members, I will punch the head of the VLE’. Within 24 hours the group had received not 1,000, but over 3,000 members. The majority were Leeds students but a fair few were students from other universities posting their sentiments, and support for the Leeds students who simply could not revise.
The group met an untimely end when the following link was sent to the groups creator: General University Disciplinary Regulations.
Highlighted was the statement:
“2.8 Conduct (wherever occurring) (see footnote 4) likely to bring the University into disrepute.”
It was demanded that the student delete the group or face expulsion from the University. Of course not wanting to lose his place at the University he proceeded to delete each of the 3,000 members one by one (as required by Facebook) to delete the group. I have been informed that this occured because the ‘Yorkshire Post’ newspaper apparently contacted the university for comment on the situation. If this is correct it seems apparent that the universities shortcomings are considered news worthy subjects.
This catch all statement that the university has placed on a website is seemingly in place as a scare tactic to deter the timid. Each and every student has a right to free speech, as does each and every human being. It is understandable were the sentiments defamatory, but they were not. Leeds University lets it students down, and bullies them.
The second shortcoming I shall be documenting is more of a personal one. I take this opportunity to make point that my actions were not acceptable in any way, shape, or form, however under all circumstances I have tried my level best to stand by my actions, and take responsibility.
One afternoon/evening in January of 2010, after completing our examinations, a few of the people with whom I live decided to play a game of Centurion. A few short hours/drunk students later, and a large amount of damage had been caused to the flat within which we resided. At 9pm a sub-warden (with whom we had previously lived) proceeded to arrive. She entered the flat and understandably was dismayed by the damage. We proceeded to leave the flat and continue on our night out. This was all we heard for a few days.
The next we heard was in the form of a series of letters/documents documenting what we had done. Harrassing the sub-warden in question, and smoking marijuana were among the blatant fallacies contained within the sub-wardens poorly written, gramatically disgraceful scrawlings. The only reasoning anyone has been able to attach to these libellous statements was our previous dispute with the sub-warden in question. This took the form of her bullying one of our good friends, and fellow flat mate. When we stood up for our friend, she appreciated our lack of respect for people of such character and left our flat. It would seem her actions were mallicious in every respect.
Towards the end of March we were called to university disciplinary. Having had a lot of our time wasted debating the statements made about our conduct, we now had to sit in front of a five man panel and explain why we did what we did, as well as why we did things that we did not do. In principle this could have been an efficient resolution – we could have sat down, explained the truth, apologized for our actions, and gone on with our lives. Instead we were forced to wait for an hour whilst they read the details of the ‘case’ (I imagine on the universities payroll). Then we sat and explained our case. One member of the panel was from the student union, a member who was meant to be able to relate, support, and help the students. Understandably he was seemingly not interested, his facial expression said that he had better things to do with his time. We likewise did, yet we had to state our case and we were not going to pass up the opportunity.
We waited a number of weeks for the resolution to the disciplinary. It came in the form of another letter. It explained how in addition to the costs of the damage we caused, we were being fined a further £250 each. Statements on the resolution letter included support for the sub-warden in question from her best friend, and her sexual partner. Impartial and fair… NOT.
At this point I had lost interest in this. I had agreed to pay for all the damage which I had caused. I obviously refused to pay the additional fine – it was based around things I did not do, and being a student I did not, and still do not have the money. As it was coming up to examination period again, I filed the letter away, forgot about it, and began preparing for my exams. It is important to note that the university does have an appeals process, however I had come to the end of my tether. I did not have the time, and I needed to work. As such an appeal was not filed.
On the 4th April, I recieved an email with a bill from the universities finance team. It contained the fine, and a further £20 fine for not paying the initial fine in a timely manner. I queried this fine, it was removed. I was informed to resolve the situation before the 4th May to avoid another fine. I sent an email around to six members of the universities staff in various departments. In one month, one of them replied – Clare Shortall. The most interesting part was in her response to me questioning where the fine would go. I was concerned that five people were being paid significant amounts of money to spend an hour reading about, and an hour passing judgements on three students based on fallacies. The response stated:
“The University does not profit from such fines. They go to the Alumni Fund, which gives scholarships and support to students experiencing hardship.”
At this point things get somewhat interesting. One of my friends who was defending himself with me has since dropped out of university. As a sufferer of depression the events that unfolded, the forceful scare tactics of the university, and the lack of respect for the students from whom they are trying to take money caused him to go into a spiral of depression, and leave the university. The fines which are meant to “support to students experiencing hardship.” have in fact caused hardship. The other two persons (myself being one) have had silly amounts of our time wasted, and have had trouble sleeping, working, well… living since this debarcle begun.
To conclude the details of the second story I am simply going to include a quote from one of my emails.
“I imagine that said fines will go to the University under the heading of ‘administrative charges’, this I find down right ridiculous. Run as a business it is plainly obvious to me that this is corporate profit maximization by manipulating the students under your jurisdiction.”
In addition to this when I put forward the idea of all future, justified disciplinary fines going to charity, it was seemingly completely ignored.
I spent some time trying to justify to myself as to why the University would be working as it is.
Being very up to date with my current affairs, and noting the University’s dire need of money (as shown in the links below), everything seemingly fits into place. The staff are unhappy, the students are unhappy, and the universities master plan to fix these problems involve stealing money from students, and cutting jobs.
Leeds lecturers vote to strike
University Funding Cuts Crisis
Top Universities want higher fees
The rules and regulations to which I have been linked on numerous occasions got me thinking. Are they legal? I cannot post a definitive answer to this question – I am not a lawyer. Perhaps someone could enlighten me as to whether my legal research is in fact correct.
Prior to posting this I contacted the student advice center to clarify where I stood in relation to expressing my views on the situation. I was pointed to the following:
“At present the two main regulations that would apply are the general disciplinary procedure:
http://www.leeds.ac.uk/aaandr/disp_reg.htm
2.8 Conduct (wherever occurring) (see footnote 4) likely to bring the University into disrepute.
And the computer misuse procedure:
http://www.leeds.ac.uk/aaandr/ucs_reg.htm
(in annex 1) The creation or transmission of defamatory material or material that is libellous of any persons or company’s reputation, products or services”
My comments may bring the university into disrepute. This is however justified disrepute. Things need to be changed, and things need to be sorted.
None of my comments are defamatory. Everything stated above is based on fact, unless otherwise specified.
On the 7th July 2010, I received a letter informing me that should a payment of £290 not be paid promptly, I would not be allowed to re-register for second year at the university. As such I am attempting to contact various members of the universities top level staff. Should an amicable resolution not be reached, this public complaint will be sent to the Office of the Independent Adjudicator, as well as various local journalists.
Comments with regards to this are more than welcome.
Thank you.